Get Free Ebook Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind
This Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind is very correct for you as novice reader. The users will consistently start their reading practice with the preferred motif. They may not consider the writer and author that develop the book. This is why, this book Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind is really right to check out. Nevertheless, the concept that is given in this book Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind will certainly reveal you lots of points. You could begin to like likewise reviewing till completion of the book Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind.
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind
Get Free Ebook Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind
Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind. In what case do you like checking out so considerably? Just what about the kind of the book Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind The demands to check out? Well, everyone has their very own factor why needs to check out some publications Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind Mostly, it will connect to their need to obtain knowledge from guide Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind as well as wish to check out simply to obtain enjoyment. Novels, tale e-book, and various other enjoyable books end up being so prominent this day. Besides, the clinical e-books will additionally be the most effective reason to decide on, particularly for the students, teachers, physicians, business person, and other professions who are warm of reading.
Why should be Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind in this website? Obtain a lot more profits as just what we have told you. You can locate the various other reduces besides the previous one. Relieve of obtaining guide Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind as what you desire is also offered. Why? We offer you lots of type of the books that will certainly not make you really feel weary. You can download them in the web link that we give. By downloading and install Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind, you have taken properly to select the ease one, as compared to the trouble one.
The Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind tends to be great reading book that is easy to understand. This is why this book Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind becomes a favorite book to read. Why do not you desire turned into one of them? You can delight in reviewing Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind while doing other activities. The presence of the soft documents of this book Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind is sort of getting encounter effortlessly. It consists of just how you must save the book Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind, not in racks of course. You could wait in your computer gadget and device.
By saving Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind in the gadget, the means you check out will also be much simpler. Open it and start checking out Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind, basic. This is reason why we propose this Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind in soft file. It will certainly not interrupt your time to obtain the book. Additionally, the online heating and cooling unit will certainly likewise relieve you to look Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind it, even without going someplace. If you have link net in your office, residence, or gizmo, you could download Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind it straight. You might not additionally wait to receive guide Vietnam: The Necessary War, By Michael Lind to send out by the vendor in other days.
A quarter century after its end, the Vietnam War still divides Americans. Some, mostly on the left, claim that Indochina was of no strategic value to the United States and was not worth an American war. Others, mostly on the right, argue that timid civilian leaders and defeatists within the media fatally undermined the war effort. These "lessons of Vietnam" have become ingrained in the American consciousness, at the expense of an accurate understanding of the war itself.
In this groundbreaking reinterpretation of America's most disastrous and controversial war, Michael Lind demolishes the stale orthodoxies of the left and the right and puts the Vietnam War in its proper context -- as part of the global conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States. The Cold War, he argues, was actually the third world war of the twentieth century, and the proxy wars in Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan were its major campaigns. Unwilling to engage each other in the heart of Europe, the superpowers played out their contest on the Asian front, while the rest of the world watched to see which side would retreat. As Lind shows, the Soviet Union and Communist China recognized the importance of Vietnam in this struggle and actively supported the North Vietnamese regime from its earliest days, a fact that was not lost on the strategic planners within the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations.
Lind offers a provocative reassessment of why the United States failed in Vietnam despite the high stakes. The ultimate responsibility for defeat lies not with the civilian policy elite nor with the press but with the military establishment, which failed to adapt to the demands of what before 1968 had been largely a guerrilla war. The high costs of the military's misguided approach in American and Vietnamese lives sapped the support of the American people for the U.S. commitment to Indochina. Even worse, the costs of the war undermined American public support for the Cold War on all fronts. Lind masterfully lays bare the deep cultural divisions within the United States that made the Cold War consensus so fragile and shows why it broke apart so easily. The consequence of U.S. military failure was thus the forfeiture of Indochina, a resurgence of American isolationism, and a wave of Soviet imperial expansion checked only by the Second Cold War of the 1980s.
The New York Times has written of Michael Lind that he "defies the usual political categories of left and right, liberal and conservative." And in an era when the United States so often finds itself embroiled in prolonged and difficult conflicts -- in Kosovo, Bosnia, and Iraq -- Lind offers a sobering cautionary tale to Americans of all political viewpoints.
- Sales Rank: #278784 in eBooks
- Published on: 2013-07-30
- Released on: 2013-07-30
- Format: Kindle eBook
Amazon.com Review
This original and provocative book is certain to raise emotions. Its justification of America's war in Southeast Asia directly contradicts other recent studies, such as Fredrik Logevall's Choosing War and Robert S. McNamara's Argument Without End. Michael Lind, Washington Editor for Harper's magazine, examines the American military response to North Vietnamese aggression; American credibility during the cold war; domestic politics; and constitutional aspects of the conflict. He places the war's center of gravity in American public opinion rather than in the population of South Vietnam or the North Vietnamese army. In doing so, he can be blunt, as when he claims that members of the Western left who made excuses for the North Vietnamese land-reform terror were "apologists for state-sponsored genocide." One of his conclusions is that if the United States is to continue to be the dominant world power, "then American soldiers must learn to swim in quagmires." Viewing America's Southeast Asian adventure in the context of the cold war, Lind regards it not as a crime, betrayal, or tragic error, but as an unavoidable confrontation. Whether you agree with his arguments, Vietnam: The Necessary War intelligently, often vehemently, challenges preconceptions that surround the most controversial military conflict in American history. --John Stevenson
From Publishers Weekly
In a very opinionated and sharply reasoned attempt to debunk three decades of conventional wisdom about Vietnam, Lind (The Next American Nation), the Washington, D.C., editor of Harper's, attacks both the right-wing contention that the U.S. could have won the war if only the politicians hadn't interfered with the military and the leftist orthodoxy that maintains the U.S. should never have become involved in the first place. Lind treats Vietnam as simply another battle in the Cold War, no different in principle from Korea or Afghanistan or any other Cold War confrontation. As such, it was both necessary and proper to intervene in Vietnam; a failure to do so, he asserts, would have permitted the Soviet Union and China to tighten their grip on the Third World. But once the U.S. committed itself, Lind argues, presidents Johnson and Nixon were obliged to fight a limited war in order to avoid the very real possibility of China entering the fray (just as it had done in Korea). If anything, Lind says, "the Vietnam War was not limited enough." Johnson allowed the U.S. military commanders to wage an expensive war of attrition that killed too many U.S. soldiers too fast and eroded public support for both the conflict in Vietnam and for the Cold War in general. The principal culprits in Lind's analysis are Johnson, General Westmoreland and other U.S. military commanders for their misguided tactics; Nixon, for his quixotic attempt to salvage "peace with honor," during which an additional 24,000 soldiers died needlessly; and the antiwar left, which swallowed much of Ho Chi Minh's propaganda. Lind's arguments, if not always persuasive, are always provocative. His book, with its intelligent analysis of U.S. intervention in Kosovo and other current foreign policy quandaries, is likely to shift the debate on Vietnam and to color future debates about U.S. military intervention abroad. (Oct.)
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
As they say, it's all in the timing. Twenty years ago, this thoroughly documented book would have rocked the publishing world. Today, though full of new sources and insights, it is a document of that time, when the world was trapped between intransigent ideologies and nearly trampled under our giant boots at every confrontation. Lind argues that the war in Vietnam, however horrifying, had to be fought not to extend ideology but to preserve the military and diplomatic credibility of the United States. Indeed, he seems almost nostalgic for the Cold War, reluctant to acknowledge that only by modifying this insistence on credibility could the major powers move beyond the their intransigence. Foreign policy study has moved beyond Lind's stance, but his considerations, however simplifying, should be examined. Though partisan and a throwback, this is still one of the best short historical analyses of the Cold War in recent years.AMel D. Lane, Sacramento, CA
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Most helpful customer reviews
34 of 40 people found the following review helpful.
Enjoyable but ultimately wrong
By J. Davis
Michael Lind has for a long time been one of my favorite writers (for two of his best see The Next American Nation and Up from Conservatism). The Necessary War is thought-provoking and very entertaining. Lind corrects some commonly held myths and blasts pro-Ho Chi Minh apologists like David Halberstam.I highly recommend this book.
Having said that, I don't agree with Lind's conclusion. His basic premise is that the war was unwinnable, but that it had to be fought for American credibility. I don't think you should fight wars and expend blood for something as abstract as credibility. Nor do I believe wars should be fought unless they can be won. Lind says 20,000 casualties would have been acceptable to keep American prestige high in our allies' eyes. I would not have spent one American life in Vietnam.
32 of 38 people found the following review helpful.
Challenges Stale Assumptions
By the dirty mac
What makes this book stand out from most others on this subject is its viewpoint. Michael Lind writes from the standpoint of liberal anti-Communism or "Cold War liberalism." This proud but now neglected tradition was best embodied by Presidents Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and Senators Hubert H. Humphrey and Henry "Scoop" Jackson. It combined an assertive foreign policy with colorblind civil rights policy and populist economic policy. Tragically, this center-left faction no longer exists as an organized entity in either party, but that's another story.
Lind ruefully notes that a half-baked consensus about Vietnam has found vogue. The U.S. need not have intervened in the first place, but "unlimited" force should have been used against the Viet Cong and North Vietnam once the U.S. did intervene. Liberal isolationists are presumed to have been correct about geopolitical considerations while conservative hawks are presumed to have been correct about military tactics. As Lind demonstrates, both halves of this consensus are misleading:
1) LBJ did not invent America's interest in preserving a non-Communist South Vietnam; it was a commitment dating back to Truman and Eisenhower. Furthermore, it's naive to assume that the U.S. would have suffered little or no damage to its international credibility or security if it allowed South Vietnam to go down the drain without a fight in 1965, especially so close on the heels of the Bay of Pigs and the construction of the Berlin Wall. In fact, the eventual victory of Moscow's North Vietnamese clients did lead to a more aggressive Soviet foreign policy, culminating in the invasion of Afghanistan in 1979.
2) LBJ, according to Lind's account, made just one significant stumble, but it was a big one. He should never have given the green light to General Westmoreland's war of attrition. Conventional tactics were an inefficient way to battle the VC, which was waging a mostly guerrilla insurgency in the make-or-break years between 1965 and 1968. The problem was not that Westmoreland was losing the war; the problem was that too many American casualties piled up too quickly. Even after the Tet Offensive, which was a defeat for the VC from a purely military standpoint, the war remained "winnable." But it was being "won" at an obscenely high price, more than the American people could bear.
An alternative was the doctrine of "counter-insurgency" a.k.a. "pacification" or "population security." As Lind explains: "[A] pacification strategy ... would have permitted a more discriminating and less expensive approach to the use of firepower while reducing American losses ... The insurgency would have withered if the U.S. and South Vietnamese forces cut off the recruits and supplies flowing to the Viet Cong from South Vietnam's densely populated coastal rim ..."
Lind does not claim that pacification by itself would have won the war. "[T]he point of pacification would have been to force Hanoi to choose between waging a conventional Korean-type war (in which the U.S. had a comparative advantage) or abandoning its attempt to conquer South Vietnam."
This book has its imperfections. For example, Lind talks from both sides of his mouth regarding America's disengagement from Indochina in 1973-75. "If any Americans deserve a share of the blame for the Khmer Rouge massacres and famine," Lind writes on page 174, "it is anti-war members of Congress ... [who denied] military aid and air support for America's Cambodian allies." Whoa! Lind spends much of the previous 173 pages explaining why the U.S. needed to get out of Indochina after 1968 (to preserve the domestic consensus in favor of the Cold War on other fronts). Now he chastises Congress for doing exactly that!?! The cutoff of aid to Lon Nol's Cambodian government came more than two years after Nixon and Kissinger signed a treaty that Lind himself calls "a thinly disguised capitulation to Hanoi." Quick fixes were futile by 1975. Recognizing this, Lind writes on page 136: "Even without the congressional cutoff of U.S. military [aid], it seems unlikely that any endgame that did not lead to an indefinite Korean-style commitment of U.S. forces to Indochina probably would have doomed South Vietnam, along with Laos and Cambodia." Thanks for clearing that up, Mike.
But overall, Michael Lind refreshingly challenges the cliches at both ends of the spectrum that have distorted discussions of the Vietnam War for too long.
27 of 34 people found the following review helpful.
A Breath of Fresh Air
By A Customer
In 284 pages, Mr. Lind shows us why we had to fight the Vietnam War. He also explains a strategy that probably would have brought victory for the United States.
He also debunks much of the liberal mythology surrounding the war. There were no "missed opportunities" to befriend the murderous North Vietnamese Communists. There was no opportunity for a Coalition Government in South Vietnam. South Vietnam's government was at least as legitimate as the North's and certainly preferable. The U.S. and South Vietnam did not violate the 1954 Geneva Conference requiring Vietnam wide elections because neither nation ratified this agreement.
Lind also debunks some of the right wing orthodoxy too. An invasion of North Vietnam would have been counterproductive if not disasterous. Also, lavish use of bombing was probably counter productive.
The only criticism I have is that this book is relatively short compared to its theme. Despite this, Mr. Lind makes compelling arguments and backs them up with quality research. I HIGHLY recommend this book to all who seek truth!
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind PDF
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind EPub
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind Doc
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind iBooks
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind rtf
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind Mobipocket
Vietnam: The Necessary War, by Michael Lind Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar